DAN CHRISTENSEN
BACK TO IMAGES
DAN CHRISTENSEN
1942, born Cozad, Nebraska
1964, received B.F.A., Kansas City Art Institute; moved to
New York City
Currently resides in East Hampton, New York
Selected
Exhibitions
Selected References
BIOGRAPHY
Over the last forty years, Dan Christensen has explored the
limits, range, and possibilities of paint and pictorial form,
pursuing a unique path within the trajectory of American abstract
painting. Although his art belongs within the category defined
by the critic Clement Greenberg as Color Field or Post-Painterly
Abstraction, he has both carried on the legacy of this approach
while stepping outside of it, through drawing from a wide
variety of Modernist sources, using many idiosyncratic techniques,
and employing methods more commonly associated with the action
painting techniques of Abstract Expressionism. The result
is a distinctive body of work that is original, surprising,
and filled with joy, exuberance, and pleasure in the act of
painting.
Created near the beginning of
his career, Christensen’s spray paintings from the late
1960s and early 1970s are emblematic of a period and scene
characterized by exuberant experimentation with materials
and processes, when painters were stretching the definition
of painting in the direction of sculpture and performance.
Much of that work was somewhat short on memorable images,
but not Christensen’s. The earliest of his paintings
in which winding vapor trails of color curl into circles and
are arrayed in grid patterns, as in Times Square (1967), are
a holdover from his prior work, in which he spread gridded
dashes across rectangular fields of damped-down color. He
went on to loop the sprayed line into canvas-filling columns,
as in Conjugate (1967)—these have been called “loop
paintings”—and, later, he bent and overlapped
them against more saturated fields of color in images that
are like much faster premonitions of the curving lines of
color that have become the principal syntactical element in
Brice Marden’s paintings. Christensen produced many
of his best spray paintings on a white or off-white ground
that was tinted by the overall build-up of the hazy edges
of his color bands. The visual organization of these works
invoked Minimalism, and their color typified that of Color
Field painting, but their gesturalism retained the valorization
of the handmade and the artist’s fresh take on color
in an industrial strength, material grain was something new.
Jules Olitski’s heavy
veils of sprayed color preceded Christensen’s paintings
by a couple of years, but Christensen focused the spray down
to its characteristically sooty line. It was Jackson Pollock,
of course, who first contrived a methodology of letting paint
fly from the hand through the end of the brush. For Pollock
this leap of material across space was a natural, if painful
and halting, evolution of the Surrealist automatism he had
practiced for several years. Christensen’s air-compressed
line, on the other hand, was a garage brainstorm: as if attaching
a booster rocket to Pollock’s gesture, from which multicolored
trails blazed, Christensen produced works that appeared as
if created from the residue from a polychrome blowtorch wielded
by a demonic handwriting teacher. Christensen’s own
indebtedness to, and affinity for, both Surrealist automatism
and totemism would only be revealed later, but were present
in these works. The only near contemporary equivalents in
abstraction were the somewhat earlier Canto Indento paintings
created by Billy Al Bengston in Los Angeles, consisting of
spray painted chevrons on dented and bent metal. It’s
also worth remembering that Christensen was wielding his spray
gun only a short time before Gordon Matta Clark started carving
architecture with his chainsaw.
Some painters develop a practiced
eye for the cultural field they are sending their work into
and setting it against. The conception of their work as a
coherent body, or “set,” helps consolidate it
as a figure against this cultural ground. Thus, almost every
abstract painter has worked modularly, with a group of elements
that evolve gradually through repetition and reconfiguration.
Christensen works this way with an extremely important, and
obvious, exception: he makes huge iconographic leaps, or breaks,
between sets. About 1970 he began to desire the plane more
than the line and let go of what he had established him only
a few years before in his mid-twenties as a singular and significant
abstract painter. His resulting geometric paintings have been
called “plaids,” a term that was also applied
to Kenneth Noland’s series of 1971-74 that displayed
a similar, though more complicated iconography (they really
were plaids). Christensen’s rectilinear planes of color
in post and lintel configurations of perpendicular angles
are more iconic, stripped down in such a way that what is
readable as the field behind the figured segmented planes
is more nearly equal to those planes in area and surface treatment.
Pictorial space is flattened a bit more even as the compositions
themselves are more traditionally asymmetrical, closer to
Piet Mondrian’s “dynamic equilibrium” than
the near Minimalist regularity of Color Field compositions.
Christensen’s colors in these paintings feel both earthier
and less predictable than the chromatic range in contemporaneous
Color Field painting. Their earthier light could find a home
in early twentieth-century American abstraction and in that
of European artists who were part of the Société
Anonyme Part of the difference in color can be explained by
his use of oil-based enamel paints, sometimes used in conjunction
with acrylics, rather than acrylic studio paints. The enamels
have a slightly warmer cast. These geometric paintings remain
linked to Color Field painting chiefly through the means and
scale of their production. Christensen made them on the floor
of his studio with rollers and jars and buckets of pre-mixed
color. Though some of these paintings are fairly modest in
size, they could be much bigger than a standard easel painting,
and the narrow formats in many of them bridge the figural
rectangle of Barnet Newman’s skinnier paintings with
the shaped canvases of the Post–minimalists, such as
Ron Gorchov, David Novros, Elizabeth Murray, and Mary Heilmann.
By this point, having left the
spray paintings behind (temporarily, as it turns out), Christensen
had indeed embarked on a restless series of procedural shifts
involving changes of tools and consistencies of paint. Each
shift in procedure was to produce a distinct imagery and,
again, the comparison with Color Field painting is instructive.
Christensen’s allover layering produced by knife and
squeegee that succeeded his geometric paintings recalls similar
techniques practiced by Olitski at the same time. Both painters
(and others, including Kenneth Noland and Walter Darby Bannard)
were exploiting new acrylic gels to create opulent color-over-color
effects and textural directionalities that flouted the prevailing
monochromes and literalized the objecthood of Minimalism.
Christensen’s paint-scraping gestures seem more agitated
than those of his somewhat older counterparts, as though he
was reveling in the athleticism of what he was doing. The
fast drying of the acrylic provided its own urgency. Hotter
colors smolder underneath a film of what seems like ice in
the off-white paintings such as Sandu (1972), and like a dirty
windowpane in the paintings where the top layer is a translucent
near-black, as in Sleepy Hollow (1974). These scraped paintings
are one signal of the end of “Post-Painterly Abstraction,”
as Greenberg termed the break between Color Field painting
and Abstract Expressionism. Obviously, Christensen’s
and Olitski’s paintings are utterly painterly, to the
point of recalling the chromatic and material weathers of
J. M. W. Turner’s late seascapes, along with the diagonals
and crescents of Baroque painting. Christensen’s paintings
are also at the apogee of the achievements of this “late”
style Post-Painterly Abstraction. They have aged as well as
Olitski’s paintings from the same period and prompt
a reconsideration of the vitality of late Color Field painting
as a whole.
In the mid- to late 1970s Christensen’s
paintings took a curious and marvelous turn away from the
unitary field altogether. If he had already begun a spatial
re-separation of color with the scraped paintings, those paintings
were still unified in their allover tactile impact. However,
by the late seventies Christensen instigated a fresh break
between field and mark, a break that is also a deep return,
for it shoots past the unified structures of Color Field Painting
to the “action” mark of Abstract Expressionism,
which was concurrent with a formative period for the artist,
but one in which he was then too young to participate. Paintings
from 1979 to 1981 depict squarish trapezoids of color nested
inside ragged dark lines, which angle off a floating vertical
axis in configurations that possess the post and lintel memory
of the artist’s geometric paintings from the beginning
of the seventies. Other linear elements float within the gravitational
field of the anchoring vertical on its flip side. The ground
in these paintings is a deep flat color that shifts from canvas
to canvas, and the drawing of shifting colors on top is in
a fluid splatter that recalls Pollock’s attack combined
with the floating geometries of Robert Motherwell’s
Open series (mid-1960s) in a hybrid of spontaneity and premeditation.
The axis line proves to be important as it provides an initiating
structure in much of the apparently spontaneous drawing with
paint that Christensen has engaged in over the ensuing quarter
century.
There is a recombinant sense
to Christensen’s painterly operations beginning in the
1980s. He is painter confident in his tools and materials,
with a deep library of experience as to what works and what
does not. So, his paintings from the mid-1980s narrow and
combine the scraping techniques of Sandu with “automatic
drawing” in an axial configuration that can be along
a diagonal, as in New Harmony (1984); in a vertical, as in
the deep red and blue Mayan Mist (1986); or in a horizontal,
such as the one positioned at the top of the yolky yellow
Love Attic (1986). By this time Christensen had once again
picked up the airbrush to add a truly graffiti-like jolt to
the color field surface. The wonderful complication of figure/ground
in these paintings can be described as follows: where the
ground color was beneath the surface drawing in the previous
paintings (and even in the first spray paintings), it now
exists on top of the color revealed by most of the mark, making
actions, which are scored down to a prior color optically
revealed now as lines against the top color. Although the
spray lines are of an obviously shallower surface than the
pudding thickness of the scored field, they are themselves;
nevertheless, they are observably on top yet again. A painting
such as Love Attic sandwiches the pudding-thick field between
two sets of lines (figures), those scored down below and those
sprayed on top. The scores are of one consistent color, while
the color of each sprayed line is different. There is a confetti,
party-like atmosphere to these paintings that, along with
their opulent physicality, might delay the reading of their
Surrealist animism, wherein each mark has the character of
a flying or coiling living thing.
Christensen was still picking
up new tools in the late 1980s. In the vertical canvas, Line
Bind (1987), he combed through the blue surface down to the
warm yellow underneath with a rake-like tool. The more complicated
Past Time (1988) captures a moment when he put all his wares
on display in a painting that nevertheless asserts an iconic
straightforwardness. There is the rake, the scraping knife,
and the spray nozzle, all functioning, but every distinguishing
mark is also at the service of the compositional whole and
every color shift is subtle and proportionate. The triangular
center form in Past Time, like the smaller floating rectangular
blocks of Mayan Mist and Love Attic, speak of a yearning for
a visual stopper, the emblematic image of the Abstract Expressionists
that becomes an indelible marker of “self.” For
Christensen, these first emblems became structural pivot points
in larger compositions, but by the late 1980s he would fill
an entire canvas with an emblematic circle, with the soft
focus boundaries that result from the return of the spray
gun as the overall vehicle for paint delivery.
The circle paintings are mesmerizing
mandalas of color and line, where each band of color is wide
enough to possess its own soft-edged interiority. The overall
effect is a dazzling visual throb, verging on the psychedelic,
just one of the feelings invoked by the title Beyond the Summer
of Love (1988).
By the early nineties, Christensen’s
woozy orbs of color were separating into iconically aligned
stacks, as in Conquistador (1993), and then proliferating
and morphing into ovals, a shape which, combined with surrounding
light halos of chromatic overtones, imbue the flat colors
with an startling sense of volume. In the late 1990s, Christensen
relegated the spray gun to being one tool among many, but
he was still using it to provide the centering visual “targets”
in the center of a brushy “X,” as in Sleeper (1998)
and Vanilla Blue (1998).
In the first few years of the
new millennium Christensen returned to a drizzle mark against
a flat field of color, in the manner of his mid-eighties paintings.
In a painting such as the gorgeous Blue Sage (2003), however,
his line is more languorous and elastic, as it wanders and
rises from its base like a spreading plant, while keeping
the speed of a Zen calligraphic master. There is definitely
an eastward bent in much of Christensen’s work, since
the circle paintings. His work is also reminiscent of the
characteristically American pragmatic optimism in David Smith’s
automatic drawing in his sculpture and drawings. Here is the
larger point to be made about Christensen’s remarkable
journey: his iconographic restlessness is at the service of
ever-greater degrees of assimilation of his cultural reach.
He is not an artist pursuing a strain of logical elaboration,
but one who moves with his enthusiasms among color (above
all), Greenbergian aesthetics, paint materiality, Abstract
Expressionism, Asian art, and the culture of painting itself.
When we are able to look back on a career of a painter whose
work has gone through so many shifts in image and technique
and find that it all makes an engaging sense, then we are
in the presence of a distinct and important sensibility, and
someone who makes painting look like the fun that is.
Stephen Westfall
|